“The hell was I thinking?”

de
Emil Wu - Memory

There’s a funny line in Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion (1997): (recalling memories about a person whom she loved/admired in high-school): “The hell was I thinking?”.

Memories tend to be like this. In childhood, you get first memories. First memories of a technical game. First memory of ice cream. First memory of a toy. First memory of a friend. First memory of a person. First memory of riding a bicycle.

And time passes, and your taste in technical objects, in food, in people, in some activities, changes.

You also change, you’re not the same.

People, objects, activities, technical things change.

And you look right now, in August 2020, at a memory some years ago, when you were a child, and you liked ice cream X, game Y, activity Z, and you still think that the memory is nice, that you might have enjoyed it, that you do know why you liked it, but, on another hand, you’re a bit surprised by the choice back then.

Citește mai departe

Printscreens of fragments of texts are overrated

de
Tim Meaney - official

Let’s say you see a message on a web site which disturbs you some way or another, it annoys you, it offends you, you find it immoral, various other things.

You might think it’s a good idea to either take a picture of the screen (quite a non-technical solution), or just hit PrintScreen on a Windows PC and paste it in a Paint image/Microsoft Word document.

The thing is, it can be quite easy to change what you see on the screen, to manipulate the message.

If you’re using Chrome / FireFox / Safari / Edge (and I wonder what else would you use, if you’re in 98% of Internet users), you can read about document.designMode = ‘on’:

As you can see, it’s so easy to change the text in a page, that even if you do take a screenshot, that may not count as a proof for “But that web site, on date X, said Y”.

A better solution is to use an external tool to save the contents of the page and put a time stamp on it.

I will only link to a Google search because this kind of tool needs to be used for a while, and online tools tend to disappear after a while, and I won’t edit this article very soon. So, a Google search »

One web site which might disappear someday »

What a web site like this is to visit the page for you and save it and put a time stamp. There are multiple solutions for this.

Citește mai departe

Second-best articles when you have nothing to write about

de
Neil Conway - Research

One guy I like to follow online writes, from time to time, very good articles on how to write like:

From time to time, I suggest other people – “Hey, you should write, too! Start a blog! Just start writing, start from somewhere!”.

And, sometimes, I get this reply “But I can’t write 10x better articles than my competition!”.

This blog post is dedicated to those people.

Citește mai departe

Soluție pentru adăugare diacritice foarte bună – https://diacritice.ai/

de
readerwalker - Tough primitive little writing machine

Dacă aveți de adăugat diacritice într-un text, există o soluție care, pe baza inteligenței artificiale, poate face asta pentru voi automat: https://diacritice.ai/.

Pur și simplu, adăugați un text, și site-ul va adăuga diacritice pentru dvs.

Site-ul are însă numeroase limitări în varianta gratuită (dimensiune text, număr încercări), și dacă aveți un text foarte mare nu este util.

De asemenea, ca orice lucru automat, poate face unele erori, e bine să verificați diacriticele adăugate, sau, poate, și mai bine, să scrieți direct cu diacritice.

Sunt și alte site-uri, dar mi se par mai puțin performante. Pe de altă parte, libertățile de lungime text sunt mult mai bune.

Citește mai departe

On productivity

de
Dhruv Patel - TIME is Important

Some people say to make a quadrant with important/less important and priority/non-priority tasks:

  • Important and priority tasks – do them first;
  • Less important, but priority OR important but smaller priority tasks – do them later;
  • Not important, non-priority tasks – postpone them until forever.

I don’t agree with this model. By following these principles, there are some things that will only get done months after they were supposed to.

I suggest you also put in your program less-than-important tasks.

What is more relevant to me is dividing time into the following types of tasks:

  • Tasks to be done when you have a lot of energy (to me, that’s the morning and first part of the day); in here – put the most difficult tasks; creative tasks, tasks which require attention;
  • Tasks do be done when you have less energy, but, still, you can finish tasks (the second part of the day); in here – put some tasks which may be a bit boring and repetitive;
  • Finally, some tasks for which you have no energy (later in the evening); in here – watching movies, reading books, reading online journals.

The thing is, at times it gets difficult to schedule tasks. Putting limits helps, forcing now to waste time on some web sites, to only reply to some messages, not to do distracting activities, help. But, at times, I plan to do X, and, still, not manage to do so.

Anyhow, the planning based on energy level works much better for me than planning based on importance.

Citește mai departe