I used to think that the only differentiator between Mega Image and other super/hyper-markets is the price (higher) and not being crowded.
I think there’s something else – they select the products to be of top quality.
If you go to pretty much any other supermarket, there’s a lottery – you buy something, you don’t know if it’s a good brand or not.
With Mega Image it’s different – you know it’s a top quality offering.
I like that. :)
Pun uneori pe Net resurse foarte complexe.
Și sunt întrebat – care e sinteza?
Am mai multe răspunsuri:
a. Mă adresez în general celor avansați, nu începătorilor;
b. Nu există nicio sinteză la ceva generalist complex;
c. Sunt lucruri complexe care e bine să rămână complexe.
Eu nu strivesc corola de minuni a lumii
și nu ucid
cu mintea tainele, ce le-ntâlnesc
în calea mea
în flori, în ochi, pe buze ori morminte.
Așa și eu – nu îmi propun să am o soluție simplă la ceva complex prin natură.
Cum reduci la sinteză absolută Biblia? Poți încerca o sinteză (Evanghelia despre porunca cea mare din Lege – Comentarii patristice | Doxologia), însă are sens și să lași lucrurile cum sunt – complexe.
Sometimes, I see people asking for things.
Some common mistakes:
Also, sometimes, I put a resource online. People ask me about it. It seems that it’s my job now to give details on the matter. It’s now my responsibility.
According to Nicolae Steinhardt and Andrei Pleșu, the answer to „Who is my neighbor?” is – „You make your own neighbor”. You take steps, it’s your work to make someone your neighbor, to help them.
If you want to find excuses for not helping someone, most likely, that person will give you plenty of excuses.
PS: Of course, if you give someone asking you for help the link to this article, they will likely be offended. „Who, me???”.
Sometimes, I find things annoying.
For example, there are service provides who do something wrong.
Yet, I keep insisting, I continue to ask for their services.
And, as time passes by, they improve, they become better and better at what they do.
When Apple launched the first iPhone it was far from perfect, but as time passed, they made it better.
The first processors, cars, CD players, could be improved.
And so they did.
Mi-a plăcut ideea lui Valeriu Nicolae – cele două doamne de la Dăruiește Viață ar fi o soluție.
În ordine:
Theodor Paleologu.
Monica Macovei.
Nicușor Dan.
Laura-Codruța Kovesi.
Pe d-l Ilie Bolojan îl văd potrivit pentru funcții de management, nu neapărat lidership.
După evenimentele recente, d-na Elena Lasconi e o opțiune în continuare, dar nu așa de atractivă.
Later edit: Și Maia Sandu.
In my opinion, there’s a reason why TED events focus on conferences, not panels.
Also, it’s quite common in the press to see „Here’s something that has been said at X conference.” It’s quite rare to hear, „In that specific Y panel, it has been said that …”
I wouldn’t say I like conference panels, and, instead, I prefer conferences. They are hard to follow from the audience (going from person A to person B is not easy), they are hard to understand (no slides, no focus, no coherence from the speeches), and sometimes they are ill-prepared („I’ll just go to the conference and do my best to answer live, no matter the quality of what I said”).
Differences between a panel discussion and a single speech – Blog de Olivian Breda.
I know people who are against a lot of things. They don’t like this, they don’t like that.
I think there’s a secret (conspiracies, look out) ingredient to add to critical thinking – thinking.
If you’re always negativistic and critical, but don’t balance this with „normal” thinking, I don’t think this is a good route.
Also, if I were to choose between what’s more realistic – too much critical thinking vs. too much optimism, it’s obvious that optimism wins.
On the other hand, optimistic persons start projects, make things happen, and are eager to start things moving.
The best solution? Critical thinking and optimism – a combination. Add to this some intelligence, and, when you need to pick between fear and courage, choose optimism.
Sometimes, I see people helping others by giving goods, not money.
While it’s 100% true that people eating bread can’t drink alcohol for the money from the bread, this thing happens – they have more money for alcohol.
So, the logic is simple – if a person who spends $1 on bread and $1 on vodka is given one free bread, they will have $2 for vodka.
Also, people have attachments to things they are involved with. If they receive a certain bread, perhaps they would prefer buying something else with that money.
For this reason, if you want to help someone, it’s safe to give them money (of course, there are exceptions).
And if you give someone who drinks alcohol a piece of bread, they will have more money for alcohol.
Mi-a reproșat recent cineva pe Facebook că îmi e frică. (și, din acest motiv, aș susține un candidat anume)
Răspunsul meu e așa – nu îmi e frică de rezultatul alegerilor, oricare ar fi el.
Îmi e frică că n-am făcut eu suficient de clar care e opțiunea mea.
Îmi e frică că n-am făcut suficient de mult pentru România.
Altfel, sunt optimist privitor la viitorul României, și al meu, ca locuitor al României.
Am încredere și în români și în România.
Altfel, pot fi și voturi greșite. În 2016 poporul britanic a votat Brexit, și unele sondaje ulterioare au arătat că regretă decizia. Poți vota și ca englez greșit, după atâția ani de experiență în libertate.
Dar, în ansamblu, și pentru britanici și pentru români, văd un viitor bun și cu speranță.
Altfel, fac tot ce ține de mine – încerc să fac binele în România, să merg la vot etc.
Asta ține de mine.
Altfel – că românii votează cu cutare – e alegerea lor, pot doar să spun ce mă motivează să aleg un candidat.
Spor la vot!
![K.H.Reichert [ ... ] - Federal press conference building | Bundespressekonferenz - Kronprinzenbrücke| Berlin - Germany](https://olivian.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/press.jpg.webp)
“Never knew before what eternity was made for. It is to give some of us a chance to learn German.” ― Mark Twain