Amintire cu doamna învățător Ecaterina Salim

Ecaterina Salim

În primele patru clase (1989-1993), am fost învățat de doamna învățător Ecaterina Salim. În ianuarie 2023 avea să ne părăsească pentru totdeauna. Dumnezeu s-o odihnească!

Am o amintire din clasele primare: pentru fiecare elev din clasă (eram undeva pe la 30 în clasă), a luat niște etichete de nectar, le-a decupat individual, și a lipit pe fiecare caiet câte o piersică/caisă, ca să ne învețe să numărăm.

Nu mai știu exact detaliile, dar era un efort considerabil să iei etichetele, să le decupezi, să lipești pe fiecare caiet al fiecărui elev.

Dacă nu mă înșel, era vorba chiar de mai multe numere, nu doar unu, poate și doi, poate mai multe.

Ținea atât de mult ca fiecare din noi să aibă un mediu plăcut de învățare, încât a făcut acest efort pentru fiecare din noi.

Citește mai departe

Follow-up to follow-up

Follow-up: Theodor Paleologu - "Creștinism și filozofie antică" (Biserica Șerban Vodă, 2018.05.27)

I enjoyed listening to a podcast with Theodor Paleologu.

During the interview, Theodor Paleologu mentioned the difference between being a leader and a follower.

It made me think – all this time, I’ve been doing follow-ups, this means I’m a follower.

And I enjoy it very much and think it’s adding some value.

But the leadership is the event itself.

I’m doing a follow-up (an article with videos & photos) to a leader (an event in which ideas are presented).

Citește mai departe

AI and Baron Munchausen

Leonorah Beverly - Discussion on the lake

Baron saves himself from being drowned in a swamp by pulling on his own hair.

Baron Munchausen – Wikipedia

There are limits to the human intelligence. We can only go so far.

Yet, people can create AI, a system that, in a few years, will likely be much smarter than even the smartest people who ever lived on Earth.

We are able to create something that is better than us.

Baron Munchausen was a fictional character with fictional deeds. Well, it seems humans have achieved fixing this.

Citește mai departe

Variation

Cum să faci SEO pentru un site, dacă site-ul folosește AJAX, și URL-urile conțin anchors (#)? Răspuns - hash bang sytnax (pentru hashtag)

I recently read about this, I think, in a book – people overrate the happiness brought by variation.

You go to an event, they have a Swedish buffet (Smörgåsbord (Swedish: [ˈsmœ̂rɡɔsˌbuːɖ] ⓘ, lit. ’sandwich-table’) is a buffet-style meal of Swedish origin. It is served with various hot and mainly cold dishes.).

A natural tendency is to taste from a lot of different foods, as they are all available.

But, likely, you’ll enjoy a few of them, and dislike much many more.

If you have to choose 8 pizzas for a party, you might pick 8 different ones. How about picking 2 or 3, with lots of repetition?

Citește mai departe

Absurd serendipity

Andrea Varga - Ice circles

Let’s say someone upsets you. Then, you, being upset, you treat someone harshly.

The logical conclusion? You did a bad act, as a reaction, follow-up, or consequence, of a bad act.

I think things are much more complicated than this. Yes, after losing something you likely feel bad, after you succeed in something, you feel good.

But ups & downs are much more complicated than this.

It’s an illusion – the idea that you can constantly feel good, only ups, only happiness, and when someone does you wrong, that person is automatically to blame.

Life is much more complex than this.

If you were to move to an isolated island, with a beach, plenty of food, and all the basic necessities, you might feel fine for a while, but after a while, the Paradise you’re in might make you feel sad.

With all the basic necessities covered, you’ll likely feel poorly on a beach.

I’m not saying you should be a masochist and try to bring pain and difficulties into your life.

But living from pleasure to pleasure will also not bring you happiness in the long run.

If you are behaving poorly, there might be many more reasons than someone doing something bad to you. It’s not that simple.

Citește mai departe

Why I don’t write about bad books and movies

byronv2 - Book and Coffee

There are authors who write – „Hmm, I didn’t like this book/movie/TV Series. Still, I will comment on it, so that you could consider avoiding it”.

Currently, I’m not a big fan of the methdod.

I prefer to focus on gems.

The main reason? I don’t necessarily get vocabulary, a certain state, or some emotions from a book. I most often look to gain some good insight from a book, and this generally doesn’t require the book to be good.

Same thing for a movie.

Thus, some books I like and some movies I like are not necessarily the same as others.

It might be a good movie that I don’t like, or it might be a poorly written book that I love.

I apply the same logic to others – if I didn’t like a book/movie, I think there could still be plenty of people who might like it.

On the other hand, I don’t like all the movies I see/books I read, so it’s actually easier to focus only on the ones I enjoy.

Citește mai departe

Binili învingi

Prem Rose - Jayantii Laughing

(„the good always triumphs” was a motto/line from Radio Guerrilla)

I have friends who prefer to see movies with happy endings.

I don’t quite get this.

I prefer not to know how a movie ends, to see some suspense.

Also, comedies tend to be quite boring.

It’s not easy to make good humor, and most movies have silly lines when talking about humor.

When I go see a play, I prefer it not to be a comedy.

Comedies tend to have low-quality humor and a predictable outcome.

Citește mai departe

First month we pay less

Mike O'Sullivan - Money

Sometimes, people say, „we’ll pay you less money in the first month. And then – then we’ll see.”.

There’s a joke like this: „- We’re going to visit the ophthalmologist today at 2 PM. – And then? – And then, we’ll see.”

But sometimes, the first month is the hardest, not the easiest.

Also, people generally quit something to get a new job.

Some CEOs receive starting bonuses just to get a job.

There are no right or wrong recipes; things must adjust to a situation.

Yet, I thinking paying a smaller salary for the first month might be wrong.

Citește mai departe

Despre planul de 200 de dolari al ChatGPT

High-Angle Photo of Robot · Free Stock Photo

Legat de: OpenAI Announces New $200 Per Month ChatGPT Pro Subscription.

ChatGPT e gratuit, dacă vrei să dai bani costă vreo 20 de dolari pe lună, iar acest plan, cu 200 de dolari pe lună e adresat celor care vor mult mai mult. Salariul minim în România e câteva mii de lei, la care se adaugă taxe. 200 de dolari pe lună vs. a avea un om care să facă sarcinile astea – așa compari.

E un plan pentru un anumit segment, iar planul de 20 de dolari pe lună îți dă deja foarte multe lucruri, nu e nevoie de cel de 200 decât în unele situații. :)

Citește mai departe