I don’t suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it! – Edward Hastings Ford
Language: English
How feedback used to be given
When I was younger, in the people around me, people tended to be more direct and give direct feedback.
As time passed, fewer and fewer people give honest feedback.
It’s a much softer way of living.
On the other hand:
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman
I’m doing my part
One day, a gigantic fire ravages a rainforest.
Distraught, every animal turns and flees from their burning home. Passive spectators walking past the edge of the forest offer their condolences, but nothing more than a passing glance or hollow words of sympathy. After all, it’s not their home being burned.
As the sky turns grey with ash and searing flames tear through the land, one small hummingbird flits to a nearby river that is yet to be touched by the destruction. Relentlessly, the bird flies back and forth from the river to the fire, filling its beak with a tiny drop of water to toss on the leaves of a burning tree.
Noticing the tiny hummingbird’s efforts, a toucan challenges him:
“You’re crazy, Hummingbird! You’ll never be able to put out the fire on your own! Why even bother when it’s so much bigger than you?”
The hummingbird pauses.
“I know”, replies the hummingbird. “But I am doing my part.”
It’s easier to focus on other’s part. To notice their mistakes, errors, and things that are not working out for them.
But it’s much better to do your own part, to focus on yourself to fix your own errors.
You are in control of your life, you can fix your mistakes easily.
Others’ errors? Not so much.
Everything you need to know about emails – Olivian Breda (2024.03.06, online)
In March and April 2024, I recorded a presentation on Everything you need to know about emails.
Below are the slides + video recording.
How to use ChatGPT for Google Analytics / Facebook Ads / Google Ads?
- How to give AI your GA4 data and let it suggest topics for search and social | LinkedIn
- Using ChatGPT for Data Analysis: Use Cases and Limitations
- New Future of Marketing – Integrating Bard/ChatGPT with Google Analytics & Search Console | LinkedIn
- Using ChatGPT’s Advanced Data Analysis plugin for PPC
- Analyzing data using ChatGPT
- Let ChatGPT analyze your Ad data in 10 mins!🔥 | by Gunhee Park | Medium
- How to Use ChatGPT for Google Ads: Expert Tactics & Real-World Cases – chatgptguide.ai
- How to use ChatGPT for Google Ads : Part 1 | LinkedIn
- ChatGPT for Facebook Ads: How to Boost Ad Performance with AI – Ad Mockups for Client Approvals Made Easy | PPC Ad Editor
- How To Analyze Data From Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Analytics 4, Tweets With Chat GPT Plus 📊 – YouTube
- ChatGPT for Google Ads: How to enhance campaign creation
Vicious / virtuous cycles
There are some vicious & virtuous cycles in using a lot of products.
Samsung and Apple make a lot of phones. Thus, they can reduce some of the costs by repeating some things. It’s generally cheaper to produce more of a thing.
Also, they can invest some profits into research.
If there’s a newcomer in the smartphone industry, they could have low prices to have a successful product. However, this will lead to low profits and low budgets allocated to research. This will bring low-quality products and fewer sales.
If a company invests in research, it will likely have better products, but it will need to increase the prices, which will reduce sales and, again, result in low profits.
It’s a big advantage – being the first in a niche.
It’s also a big advantage to be able to produce a lot of pieces of the same product.
On group interviews
I remember my first group interview—in high school when I applied for a scholarship through Open Society Foundations Romania (now defunct: Fundația pentru o Societate Deschisă —Wikipedia).
I took an English test and passed, and then there was a group interview.
There were three people, me and two girls.
Imagine our situation: at an extreme, two girls next to each other, and me.
After some initial questions, we were supposed to talk to each other.
Now, imagine how the interview went – as you can imagine, the girls started talking to each other.
I didn’t get the interview. I don’t blame it solely on the group interview issue, but I think it’s one reason.
In college, I got some group interviews with student organizations.
At some point, an HR person came to hold a conference organized by one of the organizations that organized group interviews and bluntly said that group interviews are bad. There was a lot of laughter from the audience.
The manager of the NGO rose and said they organized a series of recruitment sessions and group interviews and how good they are for doing so—oh boy! They are the greatest.
The speaker softened his message but kept his ground – group interviews are not recommended.
How I view it: In group interviews, you need to talk, but you don’t need to talk to everyone. There’s no specific reason for which a person doesn’t get spoken to; the blame is collective. If no one wants to speak to X, for whatever reason, there’s not a single individual to blame this on.
Another thing is that evaluating a group of people becomes more complex (Differences between a panel discussion and a single speech—Blog de Olivian Breda). When you talk one-to-one, you get an idea of how a person is. When evaluating a group of people, this becomes more difficult.
A better solution? If you’re an NGO and have 1,000 people applying for ten positions, you could give each person a task that you need to do (writing a blog post or doing something that could benefit you). Then, provide a more challenging task to the remaining 100 people who do the first task. Then, only have interviews to ensure you can talk to the person, but don’t refuse people because you don’t like them for whatever reason. In the end, hire 20–30 people for the NGO and give them a lot of tasks at the beginning. After a while, you should have ten very motivated persons.
I never make mistakes
I recently went to a Vodafone store.
I went around lunch, and only one person was handling clients.
A line formed with quite a few persons.
At some point, a new person came to handle clients.
The last person on the old queue wanted to be the first on the new one.
She was told she should wait in line.
And now the point—she started telling others that there should be more queues, there was not enough staff, etc.
Was she right? Of course, it was a real issue. But it was not on topic.
The real topic was that she wanted to go in front of all the people.
When she started to speak about the secondary issue, she likely refused to admit that there was an issue.
It’s very hard to correct something if you don’t first admit there’s something wrong.
It’s not a pleasant solution – you must admit that you’ve made a mistake, apologize, and start from there.
The lady chose an excellent solution, but the issue will likely be there in the future.
The easy path leads to her happiness only.
Missed opportunities
Romania is growing; we are getting some highways, and the general economic level is rising.
The thing is – we could have grown faster (see the Poland “shock therapy”), we could have had more highways, etc.
It’s nice that we are growing, but we don’t know how we could have grown further.
When we evaluate a situation, we don’t know the full consequences.