#1 You can right-click a video on YouTube and select „Loop” so that the movie will play forever and ever.
#2 You can adjust the resolution of the video so that it consumes less bandwidth. Save the planet!
#1 You can right-click a video on YouTube and select „Loop” so that the movie will play forever and ever.
#2 You can adjust the resolution of the video so that it consumes less bandwidth. Save the planet!
One time, during my professional life, I encountered a person who used to reply very fast to most emails.
Not only this, but the person also used to solve tasks quickly.
Some tasks were solved less-than-perfect, but, boy-oh-boy! – Were they done quickly.
I tried to learn from this as much as possible.
I tend to reply rather quickly to most messages.
As said before, if you give a quick answer you help that person lose less of their time.
If you value their time as much as yours, you might want to try and work fast and reply to emails quickly.
At least, that’s what I try to do.
There are some time-management solutions that claim this:
Why do I consider the advice wrong?
The logic goes as follows: if you value your time on the same level as one of your partners of discussion, you should reply to messages ASAP.
If they lose time talking to you, and they are interrupted at moment X, if you reply to them 3 hours later, they’ll also be interrupted 3 hours later.
So, it makes sense – „I’ll interrupt what I do at the current moment, to help my business partner not lose time. Their time is as valuable as mine, if I postpone answering the email/message for 3 hours, then their time will be lost. I’ll sacrifice my time for the good of the overall partnership.”
I once (in the autumn of 2001, at VIP) heard Șerban Alexandrescu (Headvertising) speak about leisure time within an advertising agency.
His affirmation (large approximation, here) was something in line with: if you run an advertising agency, you need to give your employees some spare time. If they work long hours, they don’t have the time for leisure, like watching plays, movies, going out, which will limit their ability for creativity.
This is so true. A lot of time, people focus on the working parts – „Oh, I’ll work so-and-so hours, I don’t need to read the news, watch some movies, listen to podcasts, listen to music, in other words – educate myself. No! All I need to do is work-work-work”.
There are two problems with that:
How to get more creative? I think there are two solutions:
According to a study:
If you are on the receiving end, Legg says, experiments showed that an overwhelming majority—more than 75 percent—wanted the bad news first. „If people know they are going to get bad news, they would rather get it over with,” she says. Then, if there is good news to follow, „you end on a high note.”
I generally focus on giving the bad news first. I’m happy that this is how people would actually expect it.
Why do this? It helps overcome fears. If someone has constantly in their head – „Oh, what will the bad news be?”, they might ignore the good news altogether.
Am întâlnit în câteva instanțe hoți de buzunare în autobuzele sau troleibuzele din București. În aproape toate situațiile era vorba de mașini foarte aglomerate. Te suiai în ele și erai strâns lipit de alți oameni.
Ce recomand ar fi să eviți să te sui în dreptul ușii într-un autobuz foarte aglomerat. Adică te poți sui într-un autobuz aglomerat, dacă ești undeva în mijlocul autobuzului. Dar dacă ești foarte aproape de ușă, aceea e o zonă cu risc mai ridicat.
I found out about WOOP via a great online course (“The Science of Well-Being” by Yale University | Coursera).
WOOP is a science-based mental strategy that people can use to find and fulfill their wishes, set preferences, and change their habits. (Home — WOOP my life)
What is the WOOP method?
- W: Think about your wish;
- O: The best outcome;
- O: Potential obstacles;
- P: Your if/then plan.
(via »)
There’s also a book: Gabriele Oettingen, Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation (a nice introduction to the work on using implementation intention and WOOP in your daily life).
And an article: Stop Being So Positive. And another one: WOOP – Science’s #1 Tool For Goal Achievement and Habit Change.
A quote related to the obstacles:
“When is a monster not a monster? Oh, when you love it.” ― Caitlyn Siehl
Some thoughts:
How can you tell whether someone is vegan ?
Answer: Because they tell you… again, and again, and again
One of the key things in losing weight is, at least for me, keeping track of what I eat using MyFitnessPal.com (Free Calorie Counter, Diet & Exercise Journal).
If today I eat something with a large number of calories, and with high-calorie density (highly processed foods, sweets), by weighing myself the next morning I will likely see an increase in my weight. Tracking very thoroughly my calorie intake also helps with this – it helps me keep in my mind the fact that I need to lose weight.
Other than that, I try to do some basic calorie restrictions and having a longer time frame of not eating.
I do some sports, it surely helps, but I consider the impact at a minimum level.
Cum se pot adăuga diacritice într-un text?
Sunt două mari soluții:
#1 Folosind un site dedicat cu inteligență artificială:
#2 Folosind alte site-uri, care sunt, totuși, surprinzător de bune:
It surely happened to you – you entered a room with a dilemma, and the first thing you say is, after a „Hello!”, „How can we solve the dilemma?”.
While this might appear a fine in solving the issue, it might actually be a wrong step.
What I suggest instead is to take a while.
Enter the room, ask a silly introductory question (about the weather, for example), do some small chat, take a sip of water, and only afterwards confrunt the elephant in the room.
Don’t rush it in, don’t jump right to the conclusion, don’t force things into solving hastly.
While it might appear that you’re losing precious time if you don’t go ahead and jump to the conclusion, you might actually be losing a step in the right direction for solving the problem.
So, don’t stand and solve the issue, sit, drink some tea, get into the amtosphere, and only then solve the issue.
While I might be wrong, I associate Turkish people with this kind of approach. And I applaud it!